Subject: ScienceDirect - Gait & Posture : Detecting differences between asymptomatic and osteoarthritic gait is influenced by changing the knee adduction moment model



   

 

Login:   

Register

 

 

Home

Browse

My Settings

Alerts

Help


 Quick Search

  Title, abstract, keywords


  Author




  

  Journal/book title


  Volume


  Issue


  Page


         


Gait & Posture

Volume 27, Issue 3, April 2008, Pages 485-492

Result list |  previous  < 24 of 91 >  next 

Font Size:     


  Abstract

- selected

 

 

Article

 

 

Figures/Tables

 

 

References

 

 

  Purchase PDF (586 K)

 


   E-mail Article   

   Add to my Quick Links   

 

 

 

 

Related Articles in ScienceDirect

 

Foot progression angle and the knee adduction moment: a...

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

 

Mechanical factors relate to pain in knee osteoarthriti...

Clinical Biomechanics

 

KINEMATIC, KINETIC AND NEUROMUSCULAR GAIT CHANGES OF TH...

Journal of Biomechanics


 

View More Related Articles

 

 doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.06.004      

Crown copyright © 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Detecting differences between asymptomatic and osteoarthritic gait is influenced by changing the knee adduction moment model

Robyn S. Newell, Cheryl L. Hubley-Kozey, William D. Stanish and Kevin J. Deluzio

School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada


Received 4 October 2006;  revised 27 February 2007;  accepted 11 June 2007.  Available online 30 August 2007. 

 

Abstract

Introduction

The adduction moment measured at the knee during gait is important to the study of osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of describing the knee adduction moment using three different biomechanical models, and furthermore, how the choice of model affects differences that are identified between asymptomatic and osteoarthritic gait.

Methods

Gait was measured for 44 asymptomatic subjects and 44 subjects with moderate osteoarthritis. The adduction moment was calculated and compared using three common biomechanical models: a 2D coordinate system, a 3D tibial coordinate system, and a 3D floating axis coordinate system. Several portions of the gait cycle waveform were compared between the two groups.

Results and discussion

It was found that the choice of biomechanical model changes the overall magnitude and shape of the adduction moment waveform (maximum value changed 8–14% and peak value changed 5–17%). Significant differences between the study groups were found for each model applied; but more importantly, the portions of the gait cycle exhibiting the differences depended on the model.

Conclusion

These findings support the importance of specifying the knee model and waveform feature used to compare asymptomatic and osteoarthritic groups. The overall magnitude of the adduction moment throughout stance, and the mid-stance adduction moment value were found to differentiate between the two groups regardless of the adduction moment model.

Keywords: Adduction moment; Knee osteoarthritis; Biomechanical model; Waveform features; Gait analysis

Article Outline

1. Introduction

2. Methods

2.1. Subjects

2.2. Gait

2.3. Kinetics

2.4. Modeling

2.5. Waveform features

2.6. PCA

2.7. Statistics

3. Results

3.1. Discrete waveform features

3.2. PCA

4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Acknowledgements

References







Gait & Posture

Volume 27, Issue 3, April 2008, Pages 485-492

Result list | previous < 24 of 91 > next 

 

 

Home

Browse

My Settings

Alerts

Help

 

About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy

 

Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.