Subject: Wiley InterScience :: Article Full Text HTML Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking



 

Arthritis & Rheumatism

  What is RSS?

Volume 52, Issue 9, Pages 2835-2844

Published Online: 6 Sep 2005

Copyright © 2005 American College of Rheumatology

 

 




 

All Content

Publication Titles


Enter words or phrases

 

-->



 

All Content

Publication Titles


Enter words or phrases

 

 

< Previous Article  |  Next Article >

  Save Article to My Profile        Download Citation

Abstract  |  References  |  Full Text: HTML , PDF (271k)

View Full Width

 

 

 Research Article

Secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Increased load at the ankle, knee, and hip during walking


Annegret Mündermann *, Chris O. Dyrby, Thomas P. Andriacchi

Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, and Bone and Joint Center, Palo Alto, California

email: Annegret Mündermann (amuender@stanford.edu)

*Correspondence to Annegret Mündermann, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Durand Building 205, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4038

Funded by:
  NIH; Grant Number: AR-39239


Abstract

 

 

 

 

 

 


Objective

This study tested the hypothesis that gait changes related to knee osteoarthritis (OA) of varied severity are associated with increased loads at the ankle, knee, and hip.


Methods

Forty-two patients with bilateral medial compartment knee OA and 42 control subjects matched for sex, age, height, and mass were studied. Nineteen patients had Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) radiographic severity grades of 1 or 2, and 23 patients had K/L grades of 3 or 4. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were measured in the hip, knee, and ankle while the subjects walked at a self-selected speed.


Results

Patients with more severe knee OA had greater first peak knee adduction moments than their matched control subjects (P = 0.039) and than patients with less severe knee OA (P < 0.001). All patients with knee OA made initial contact with the ground with the knee in a more extended position than that exhibited by control subjects. An increased axial loading rate was present in all joints of the lower extremity. Patients with more severe knee OA had lower hip adduction moments compared with their matched control subjects.


Conclusion

The secondary gait changes observed among patients with knee OA reflect a potential strategy to shift the body's weight more rapidly from the contralateral limb to the support limb, which appears to be successful in reducing the load at the knee in only patients with less severe knee OA. The increased loading rate in the lower extremity joints may lead to a faster progression of existing OA and to the onset of OA at joints adjacent to the knee. Interventions for knee OA should therefore be assessed for their effects on the mechanics of all joints of the lower extremity.


Received: 24 January 2005; Accepted: 3 June 2005


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)


10.1002/art.21262  About DOI


Article Text


Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that affects an increasing proportion of the population ([1-3]). Although most joints of the lower extremity, including the ankle and hip, may be involved, the knee is the most common site for OA ([4]). Changes related to OA are more frequently observed in the medial compartment than in the lateral compartment of the knee ([5]). Moreover, loads transferred through the medial compartment during walking are substantially higher than loads transferred through the lateral compartment ([6]). The distribution of loads transferred through the medial and lateral compartments during walking can be estimated by the external knee adduction moment ([6]); a higher external knee adduction moment indicates greater loads in the medial than in the lateral compartment. The first peak knee adduction moment during walking has been shown to be a strong predictor of the presence ([7-9]), severity ([10][11]), and rate ([12]) of progression of medial compartment knee OA. However, little attention has been paid to the changes in the mechanical environment of other joints of the affected limb, which presumably occur concomitantly with changes in knee-joint mechanics.

Most studies investigating the gait of patients with knee OA have concentrated on kinematics and kinetics at the knee ([7][8][13-16]), ground reaction forces ([7][8][15][17]), and the sagittal plane ([13][17-20]). Moreover, study populations have typically been small ([8][15][20]) and involve a range of OA stages, from early OA ([15]) to severe OA ([18]). In addition, knee OA has been used as a generic inclusion criterion ([13][14][16][17][19][21]); that is, no distinction was made between patients with OA affecting the medial knee compartment and those with knee OA in the lateral compartment. Nevertheless, these previous studies indicate that patients with knee OA seem to experience a smaller range of knee flexion during the stance phase of walking ([13][14][16][18][21]), which is associated with a smaller net quadriceps moment ([14][16]). However, such differences in sagittal-plane knee kinematics and kinetics could be caused primarily by slower walking speeds ([22][23]), as has been reported for patients with knee OA in most gait studies ([8][14][16-18][21]). Similarly, it is likely that the observed reduction in ground reaction forces ([8][17][21]) in patients with knee OA is attributable to slower walking speeds.

Hurwitz et al ([24]) reported higher knee adduction moments in patients with medial compartment knee OA who were receiving pain medication. Thus, patients seem to adopt a gait pattern in an attempt to unload the affected structures during walking, possibly by changing moments at the adjacent ankle and/or hip. Moreover, patients with less severe knee OA adopt a gait pattern that differs from that of patients with more severe OA and control subjects, which is indicative of the potential to reduce the adduction moment when walking at slower speeds ([10]). These gait changes appear to be associated with increased loading rates, defined as increased slopes of the ground reaction force curve immediately following heel strike during walking ([15][21]). It is likely that the increased loading rate at the foot is transferred, to some extent, to the joints proximal to the foot-ground interface. If this is the case, then patients with knee OA may experience not only greater relative loads on the medial compartment of the knee, but also a more rapid increase in axial force at the ankle, knee, and hip. A higher loading rate at the tissue level may lead to the initiation ([25]) or propagation ([26]) of surface fissures in cartilage, similar to that seen in OA cartilage, which may ultimately lead to a faster rate of progression of OA. Thus, secondary gait changes in patients with medial compartment knee OA may be associated with increased load not only on knee cartilage, but also on cartilage at the ankle and the hip.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the loading environment of the major joints of the lower extremity during walking in patients with medial compartment knee OA of varied severity. We hypothesized that gait changes related to knee OA of varied severity are associated with increased loads at the ankle, knee, and hip, and that most changes will occur in the frontal plane.


PATIENTS AND METHODS

 

 

 

 

 

 


Patients.

Forty-two patients with bilateral OA in the medial compartment of the knee participated in this study (Table 1) after giving their written consent in accordance with policies of the institutional review board. All subjects fulfilled all inclusion criteria for participation in this study, as follows: definite osteophyte presence in the medial or lateral tibiofemoral compartment, a smaller interbone distance at the narrowest point of the medial compartment compared with the lateral compartment, pain in and around at least 1 knee for most of the days in the previous months, and at least some difficulty with 2 or more items in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index physical function scale ([27]). Twenty-two exclusion criteria for patients with knee OA were used: rheumatoid or other systemic inflammatory arthritis, avascular necrosis, periarticular fracture, Paget's disease of bone, villonodular synovitis, chronic knee-joint infection, ochronosis, neuropathic arthropathy, acromegaly, hemachromatosis, Wilson's disease, osteochondromatosis, gout or recurrent pseudogout, osteopetrosis, total knee replacement in either knee, flexion contracture >15° in either knee, OA grade higher than moderate (on a scale of none, mild, moderate, and severe) by examination (history and physical examination) of either ankle or either hip (using the American College of Rheumatology criteria [28]), morbid obesity (body mass index [BMI] >45 kg/m2), intraarticular corticosteroid injection within the previous 2 months, knee surgery within the previous 6 months, plan for total knee replacement within the next year, and hip or spine disease as the major source of disability.

 

Table 1. Characteristics of patients with medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) and matched control subjects*


Variable

Patients

Control subjects

P vs. control subjects 

P, less vs. more severe knee OA 


Less severe knee OA (n = 19)





   Sex, no. female/no. male

13/6

13/6


0.110

   Age, years

65.2 ± 12.5 (36-82)

61.7 ± 12.3 (39-86)

0.392

0.950

   Height, cm

164.9 ± 8.8 (147-178)

165.1 ± 7.4 (150-176)

0.929

0.007

   Mass, kg

73.3 ± 10.7 (54-95)

71.4 ± 10.1 (54-93)

0.562

0.017

   BMI, kg/m2

26.9 ± 3.1 (22-34)

26.1 ± 2.6 (22-33)

0.511

0.476

   Knee pain (VAS scale 0-100)

13.6 ± 8.8 (2.5-32.1)

-


0.153

   Medial tibiofemoral JSN grade (scale 0-3)

0.3 ± 0.3 (0.0-1.0)

-


<0.001

   Lateral tibiofemoral JSN grade (scale 0-3)

0.0 ± 0.1 (0.0-0.5)

-


0.002

   Patellofemoral JSN grade (scale 0-3)

0.6 ± 0.6 (0.0-1.8)

-


0.595

   Self-selected walking speed, meters/second

1.26 ± 0.23 (0.79-1.69)

1.16 ± 0.15 (0.82-1.40)

0.197

0.854

More severe knee OA (n = 23)





   Sex, no. female/male

10/13

10/13



   Age, years

65.0 ± 8.0 (49-80)

63.7 ± 9.2 (49-84)

0.311


   Height, cm

172.9 ± 9.1 (156-190)

172.8 ± 7.7 (155-185)

0.923


   Mass, kg

83.0 ± 14.0 (60-106)

80.9 ± 13.6 (60-105)

0.359


   BMI, kg/m2

27.8 ± 4.8 (20-37)

27.1 ± 4.0 (22-37)

0.194


   Knee pain (VAS scale 0-100)

17.4 ± 7.6 (5.6-33.3)

-



   Medial tibiofemoral JSN grade (scale 0-3)

1.7 ± 0.7 (0.0-3.0)

-



   Lateral tibiofemoral JSN grade (scale 0-3)

0.1 ± 0.3 (0.0-0.5)

-



   Patellofemoral JSN grade (scale 0-3)

0.5 ± 0.6 (0.0-1.5)

-



   Self-selected walking speed, meters/second

1.25 ± 0.22 (0.91-1.68)

1.23 ± 0.21 (0.84-1.66)

0.833



  * Except where indicated otherwise, values are the mean ± SD (range). Less severe knee OA is defined as a Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade  2, and more severe as a K/L grade  3. BMI = body mass index; VAS = visual analog scale; JSN = joint space narrowing.

    P values are based on paired (patients versus controls) and independent (between patient groups) Student's t-tests, except for the sex distribution, which is compared by Mann-Whitney U test.



Control subjects.

For each patient, an asymptomatic control subject, matched for sex, age (±5 years), height (±5 cm), and mass (±5 kg), was selected and included in the study after their written consent was provided in accordance with the policies of the institutional review board. All asymptomatic control subjects (Table 1) had no clinical diagnosis of OA or rheumatoid arthritis or a history of knee trauma or pain. The patient and control groups did not differ in age, height, mass, or BMI (Table 1). None of the control subjects had previously been treated for any clinical lower back or lower extremity condition and none had any activity-restricting medical or musculoskeletal condition.


Clinical assessment.

The Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) radiographic severity grades for both knees of patients with medial compartment knee OA were determined based on clinical and radiographic data (0 = no osteophytes, 1 = possible osteophyte lipping, 2 = definite osteophytes and possible joint space narrowing, 3 = moderate multiple osteophytes and definite joint space narrowing, as well as some sclerosis and possible bone contour deformity, 4 = large osteophytes, marked joint space narrowing, severe sclerosis, and definite bone contour deformity [29]). Patients were classified as having less or more severe knee OA based on the K/L grades of both knees. The less severe OA group consisted of patients with a K/L grade of  2 for either knee. Patients with at least 1 knee assigned a K/L grade  3 were placed in the more severe OA group.

The mechanical axes of all knee joints were measured by the same rheumatologist on a single weight-bearing radiograph that included the hip, knee, and ankle; the axes were determined as the angle between a line from the center of the femoral head to the center of the femoral intercondylar notch, and a line from the center of the tips of the tibial spines to the ankle talus ([30]). To minimize measurement variation related to limb rotation, each patient was positioned with the tibial tubercle in the anterior view. Neutral alignment was defined as zero, varus alignment as positive angles, and valgus alignment as negative angles.


Gait analysis.

Patients and control subjects performed walking trials in their own low-top, comfortable walking shoes. All subjects were instructed to walk at their self-selected normal speed (Table 1). The approach used to collect kinematic and kinetic data is identical to that described in previous investigations ([31][32]). Briefly, reflective markers were placed on the leg along the superior iliac spine, greater trochanter, lateral joint line of the knee, lateral malleolus, lateral aspect of the calcaneus, and head of the fifth metatarsal. Marker data were obtained using 4 high-speed cameras (120 frames/second, MCU240; Qualisys Medical, Gothenburg, Sweden).

Data on the ground reaction force were collected using a force platform (sampling frequency 120 Hz; Bertec, Columbus, OH) that was placed in the center of the walkway, level with the ground. Each limb segment (thigh, shank, and foot) was idealized as a rigid body with a local coordinate system that was defined to coincide with a set of anatomic axes. Intersegmental angles, external moments, and forces were calculated from the position of the markers, measurements of the ground reaction force, and properties of the limb segment mass/inertia. The angle, force, and moment at the knee were resolved into a coordinate system fixed in a tibial reference system, with axes defining flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and internal-external rotation. Similarly, the angle, force, and moment at the ankle were resolved into a coordinate system fixed in a foot reference system, with axes defining dorsiflexion-plantar flexion, eversion-inversion, and adduction-abduction. The angle, force, and moment at the hip were resolved into a coordinate system fixed in a thigh reference system, with axes defining flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and internal-external rotation.

The axial forces at the ankle, knee, and hip were defined as the resultant intersegmental forces at these joints, resolved along the long axis of the distal segment (foot, shank, and thigh, respectively), taking into account the ground reaction force, the weight of the distal segment, and inertial forces ([33]). The mediolateral ground reaction force is related to the acceleration of the center of gravity in the mediolateral direction, which contributes to the external knee adduction moment at the knee.

Discrete variables describing peak values of the ground reaction force and kinematics and kinetics for each joint in 3 dimensions (Table 2) were calculated using an in-house algorithm written in Mathematica version 4.1 (Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL). Forces were normalized to body weight (with results expressed as %Bw), and moments were normalized to body weight and height (with results expressed as %Bw·Ht) to allow for comparison between subjects. The average values from 3 trials at the self-selected walking speed were calculated for each joint, which then allowed for comparison of the average values for each patient and control subject.

 

Table 2. Definition of ground reaction forces and lower extremity kinematic and kinetic variables used in this study


Variable

Definition


Ground reaction force


   Maximum vertical force

Maximum vertical ground reaction force during first half of stance phase.

   Maximum lateral force

Maximum lateral ground reaction force during first half of stance phase.

   Maximum vertical loading rate

Maximum slope of the vertical ground reaction force during first 10% of stance phase.

Ankle


   Maximum inversion moment

Maximum inversion moment at the ankle during stance phase.

   Maximum axial loading rate

Maximum slope of the axial force at the ankle (intersegmental resultant force resolved along the abduction/adduction axis of the foot) during first 10% of stance phase.

Knee


   Initial flexion angle

Knee flexion angle at heel strike.

   Maximum extension angle

Minimum knee flexion angle during terminal stance.

   Maximum abduction moment

Maximum abduction moment at the knee during first 20% of stance phase.

   First peak adduction moment

Maximum adduction moment at the knee during first 50% of stance phase.

   Second peak adduction moment

Maximum adduction moment at the knee during second 50% of stance phase.

   Maximum axial loading rate

Maximum slope of the axial force at the knee (intersegmental resultant force resolved along the long axis of the shank) during first 10% of stance phase.

Hip


   Maximum abduction moment

Maximum abduction moment at the hip during first 20% of stance phase.

   First peak adduction moment

Maximum adduction moment at the hip during first 50% of stance phase.

   Second peak adduction moment

Maximum adduction moment at the hip during second 50% of stance phase.

   Maximum axial loading rate

Maximum slope of the axial force at the hip (intersegmental resultant force resolved along the long axis of the thigh) during first 10% of stance phase




Statistical analysis.

Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to detect an overall significant difference in gait patterns between patients with medial compartment knee OA and matched control subjects and between patients with less severe (K/L grades  2) and more severe (K/L grades  3) knee OA (defined from the more severely affected knee of each patient). When a significant result was obtained by MANOVA, separate mixed-factor univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) models, with severity as the intersubject factor (less severe versus more severe OA) and presence of OA as the intrasubject factor (repeated measure to account for the fact that patients and control subjects were matched 1:1), were used to detect significant differences in discrete variables that describe the 3-dimensional intersegmental angles, moments, and forces between patients with medial compartment knee OA and matched control subjects and between patients with less severe (K/L grades  2) and more severe (K/L grades  3) knee OA. The significance level for all ANOVAs was set at 5%. Student's paired and independent-sample t-tests were used for post hoc analysis to detect significant differences between patients with knee OA and control subjects and between patients with less severe and more severe knee OA, respectively. The significance level for the Student's t-tests was adjusted to account for multiple comparisons (  = 0.025).


RESULTS

 

 

 

 

 

 


Gait and alignment.

The general gait pattern differed between patients with knee OA and matched control subjects (P < 0.001 by MANOVA, >99.9% power) despite the fact that they walked at similar speeds (Table 1). Patients with more severe knee OA had a 6.0° greater varus mechanical axis alignment than did patients with less severe knee OA (5.7° versus 0.3°; P < 0.001).


Kinematics.

The angle of knee flexion at heel strike was different between patients and matched control subjects. All patients with knee OA made initial contact with the ground with the knee in a 5.3° more extended position than that of the control subjects. This difference was more pronounced in patients with less severe knee OA (for patients versus controls, 1.8° versus 5.3°) than in patients with more severe knee OA (for patients versus controls, 0.9° versus 4.6°) (P = 0.003 for both). All other sagittal plane angles at the ankle, knee, and hip were similar between all groups.


Joint moments.

All patients with knee OA walked with 18.1% greater hip flexion moments during terminal stance compared with that of their matched control subjects (for patients with less severe OA versus controls, 4.0% Bw·Ht versus 3.1% Bw·Ht; for patients with more severe OA versus controls, 3.8% Bw·Ht versus 3.5% Bw·Ht [P = 0.011 for both]). All other sagittal plane moments at the ankle, knee, and hip were similar between all groups.

Following heel strike, maximum abduction moments at the knee and at the hip were increased 93.3% and 100.7%, respectively, in all patients with knee OA compared with their matched controls (P < 0.001) (Figures 1 and 2). At the knee, the difference in maximum abduction moment compared with that in matched control subjects was greater in patients with less severe knee OA (+162.9%) than in patients with more severe knee OA (+45.5%).


 

Figure 1. Maximum external knee abduction moment and first and second maximum external knee adduction moments (expressed as percent body weight and height [%Bw·Ht]) during the stance phase of walking in patients with less severe (Kellgren/Lawrence [K/L] grades  2; n = 19) and more severe (K/L grades  3; n = 23) medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) and asymptomatic control subjects matched for sex, age, height, and mass (n = 42). The solid curve represents the shape of the average external knee adduction moment during one step for asymptomatic subjects.   = P < 0.05 versus matched control group;    = P < 0.05 for patients with less severe versus more severe knee OA. Bars show the mean ± SD. HS = heel strike; TO = toe-off.

[Normal View 16K | Magnified View 57K]


 

Figure 2. Maximum external hip abduction moment and first and second maximum external hip adduction moments during the stance phase of walking in patients with less severe (K/L grades  2; n = 19) and more severe (K/L grades  3; n = 23) medial compartment knee OA and asymptomatic control subjects matched for sex, age, height, and mass (n = 42). The solid curve represents the shape of the average external hip adduction moment during one step for asymptomatic subjects.   = P < 0.05 versus matched control group. Bars show the mean ± SD. See Figure 1 for definitions.

[Normal View 16K | Magnified View 55K]


During the mid-stance and terminal-stance phases, patients with more severe knee OA had significantly greater first peak adduction moments at the knee than their matched control subjects (+11.4%; P = 0.039) and than patients with less severe knee OA (+27.9%; P < 0.001) (Figure 1). Patients with less severe knee OA had significantly lower second peak adduction moments at the knee than their matched control subjects (-32.8%; P = 0.001) and than patients with more severe knee OA (-37.8%; P < 0.001). Patients with more severe knee OA had significantly lower first and second peak adduction moments at the hip compared with their matched control subjects (first peak -20.3%; P = 0.024; second peak -29.0%; P < 0.001) (Figure 2). In terminal stance, all patients with knee OA had 18.2% smaller maximum inversion moments at the ankle (for patients with less severe OA versus controls, 1.6% Bw·Ht versus 1.9% Bw·Ht; for patients with more severe OA versus controls, 1.7% Bw·Ht versus 2.0% Bw·Ht [P = 0.017 for both]).


Ground reaction and intersegmental axial forces.

Shortly after heel strike, the lateral ground reaction force in all patients with knee OA was 54.0% higher than that in control subjects. In addition, the magnitude of the increase was related to severity (for patients with less severe OA versus controls, 5.7% Bw versus 3.8% Bw; for patients with more severe OA versus controls, 7.2% Bw versus 4.6% Bw [P < 0.001 for both]). The vertical loading rate, or the slope of the ground reaction force, in all patients with knee OA was elevated by 50.1% compared with that in the matched control subjects (for patients with less severe OA versus controls, 1,176.5% Bw/second versus 746.0% Bw/second; for patients with more severe OA versus controls, 1,158.7% Bw/second versus 794.8% Bw/second [P < 0.001 for both]). The increased vertical loading rate was consistent with increased intersegmental axial loading rates at all joints of the lower extremity, with a 64.4%, 55.5%, and 59.2% increase in the axial loading rate at the ankle, knee, and hip, respectively (P < 0.001) (Figure 3).


 

Figure 3. Maximum axial hip loading rate (calculated as the maximum change in axial hip force [ F] per time unit [ t], with results expressed as percent body weight/second [%Bw/s]) during weight acceptance while walking in patients with less severe (K/L grades  2; n = 19) and more severe (K/L grades  3; n = 23) medial compartment knee OA and asymptomatic control subjects matched for sex, age, height, and mass (n = 42).   = P < 0.05 versus matched control group. Bars show the mean ± SD. See Figure 1 for other definitions.

[Normal View 18K | Magnified View 60K]


Maximum axial forces at the ankle, knee, and hip were only slightly different between patients with knee OA and matched control subjects (at the ankle +4.8% [P = 0.029]; at the knee +4.0% [P = 0.060]; at the hip 9.0% [P = 0.020]). Moreover, the maximum axial forces at the ankle, knee, and hip were unaffected by the severity of the disease (P > 0.867 between patients with less severe and more severe knee OA).


DISCUSSION

 

 

 

 

 

 

This study demonstrated that gait changes related to medial compartment knee OA are dependent on the severity of the disease. We hypothesized that gait changes related to knee OA of varied severity are associated with increased axial loading at the ankle, knee, and hip, and that most changes will occur in the frontal plane. The results of this study support our hypothesis, since most changes were observed in the frontal plane moments and forces in the joints of the lower extremity. Patients with medial compartment knee OA and their matched control subjects walked at similar speeds (Table 1), and thus differences in gait patterns cannot be attributed to differences in walking speeds. Similarly, pain ratings and patellofemoral joint space narrowing were similar among patients with less severe knee OA and patients with more severe knee OA (Table 1), and thus differences in gait patterns between patient groups cannot be attributed to differences in pain level or patellofemoral OA.

All patients with knee OA landed with the knee in a more extended position and experienced a more rapid increase in the ground reaction force that was reflected in greater vertical loading rates. A more rapid increase in ground reaction force indicates a more rapid shift of the body's weight from the contralateral limb to the support limb. The greater knee and hip abduction moments immediately following heel strike in all patients with knee OA (Figures 1 and 2) suggest that patients exert greater hip adductor muscle forces during this period to move their trunk laterally. To accomplish a more lateral trunk motion, the foot would exert a medial force on the ground, which would be reflected in a greater subsequent ground reaction force during this period, as observed in this study. This change in loading pattern is a potential mechanism of gait compensation used by patients with knee OA to reduce the mediolateral distance between the center of mass and the knee joint center, thereby reducing the moment arm of the ground reaction force and supposedly reducing the knee adduction moment at a later point in the stance phase.

Differences in the ankle inversion moment between groups were much smaller than differences in the knee and hip adduction moments. Moreover, the differences in the ankle inversion moment occurred during the second half of the stance phase, while the peak adduction moment at the knee occurs in the first half of the stance phase. These 2 observations suggest that the potential mechanism of gait compensation is more likely driven by changes in trunk acceleration than by changes in ankle-joint kinetics.

Patients with less severe knee OA (K/L grades  2) had hip adduction moments throughout the stance phase that were similar to their matched control subjects (Figure 2). The external hip adduction moment is balanced by the hip abductor muscle moment, suggesting that patients with less severe knee OA have sufficiently strong hip abductor muscles to maintain the altered position of the trunk, resulting in similar first peak knee adduction moments and reduced second peak knee adduction moments compared with their matched control subjects (Figure 1). Thus, patients with less severe knee OA seem to adopt a strategy of gait compensation that allows them to control and lower the load at the medial compartment of the knee (Figure 4), thereby reducing their risk for progression of their disease ([12]).


 

Figure 4. Gait changes and potential mechanism of gait compensation in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences are relative to control subjects matched for sex, age, height, and mass and are shown between patients with less severe knee OA and patients with more severe OA. Negative effects of the presence of knee OA, greater varus alignment, and presumably weak hip abductor muscles include high axial loading rates at the ankle, knee, and hip and high first peak knee adduction moments.

[Normal View 32K | Magnified View 125K]


In contrast, patients with more severe knee OA (K/L grades  3) had substantially lower hip adduction moments throughout the stance phase compared with their matched control subjects (Figure 2). Thus, it is likely that patients with more severe knee OA lack the hip abductor muscle strength required to maintain the altered position of the trunk. In this patient group, the contralateral hip may drop throughout the swing phase, leading to a lateral movement of the trunk away from the support limb, which is similar to what is clinically referred to as Trendelenburg gait. The increased mediolateral distance between the center of mass and the knee-joint center and the greater varus alignment in these patients presumably result in higher first peak knee adduction moments (Figure 1).

It has been suggested that hip adductor muscles may have the capability to stabilize knees with medial compartment OA or knees with varus alignment ([34]). Yamada et al showed that hip adductor muscles are stronger with increasing OA severity, and with greater varus alignment with similar hip abductor muscle strength ([34]). Thus, although patients with more severe knee OA may adopt a strategy of gait compensation similar to that demonstrated by patients with less severe knee OA, those with more severe knee OA may require a net hip abductor moment not only for maintaining a level pelvis, but also for knee varus control. In that case, even with gross abductor moments similar to those in patients with less severe disease and to those in control subjects, they may not be able to maintain a level pelvis, so that patients with more severe knee OA are unable to control or lower the load at the medial compartment of the knee (Figure 4), thereby increasing their risk for progression of their disease ([12]).

This proposed strategy of gait compensation in patients with medial compartment knee OA is supported by the fact that the magnitude of the first peak knee adduction did depend, in part, on the magnitude of the hip abduction moments (R2 = 0.249, P < 0.001 by linear regression analysis). This strategy may come at the cost of increased load at adjacent joints; that is, all patients with knee OA walked with substantially increased vertical loading rates (ground reaction force) and axial loading rates (at the ankle, knee, and hip) (Figure 3). Radin et al ([15]) reported increases in the vertical loading rate in patients with presumably pre-OA changes because of mild, intermittent, and activity-related knee pain, and yet the reported increases were smaller than the increases observed in the present study. Radin et al referred to these observed differences in gait between patients with knee OA and control subjects as  microklutziness  and compared the sequence of consecutive steps with this pattern to repetitive impulse loading.

In the present study, intersegmental resultant joint forces were estimated based on the ground reaction force, the weight of the distal segment, and inertial forces. The results of this analysis show that the increase in loading rate immediately following heel strike is transferred through all joints of the lower extremity and can also be observed at the hip. The axial hip loading rates reported in this study are similar to values reported by Bergmann et al using instrumented hip endoprostheses ([35]), even though Bergmann et al measured the stem-cup contact force at the hip that also takes into account muscle forces. Moreover, the percentage differences in axial hip loading rate between patients and matched control subjects in the present study are only slightly larger than those between different footwear conditions, measured with an instrumented hip endoprosthesis ([35]). Similar to the findings by Bergmann et al, the percentage changes in loading rate in this study were much greater than those in joint force. Thus, although the joint forces reported in the present study were measured indirectly and represent resultant joint forces, the axial loading rates appear to be good estimates of the actual loading rates at the joint.

Changes in the axial loading rate at the ankle, knee, and hip may be harmful to cartilage. Indeed, higher loading rates have been shown to generate more surface fissuring of cartilage than lower loading rates ([25]), and surface fissures in the cartilage can propagate mechanically if the joint surface is subjected to rigorous repetitive loading ([26]). Thus, increased loading rates may not only accelerate fibrillation of already damaged cartilage, as observed in severe knee OA, but may also lead to the initiation of OA at adjacent joints, including the hip. However, although 37.6% of patients with radiographic knee OA also have radiographic hip OA ([36]), information is lacking on the relationship between gait changes associated with medial compartment knee OA and the development of secondary hip OA.

The anatomy of the tibiofemoral joint is uniquely disparate from that of other synovial joints, including the ankle and hip, because the tibia and femur articulate in 2 compartments (medial and lateral), the menisci increase the contact areas, the ligaments mainly guide joint motion, and the muscles stabilize the joint in static and dynamic situations. This bicondylar configuration makes the knee particularly susceptible to acute and chronic changes in the mechanical environment associated with injury (e.g., rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament) and with aging or menopause ([37]), since applying a greater moment in abduction or adduction direction to a bicondylar joint will merely shift the net contact point toward one compartment, and thus always increase the load in one compartment. In contrast, the joints of the ankle-joint complex (subtalar and talocrural joints) and the hip of a healthy person have highly congruent articulating surfaces. Articulating bones contact in one area, and thus can be idealized as hinge or ball-and-socket joints. Joint moments can be described by a force couple, and applying a greater moment to a ball-and-socket joint or about the sole axis of rotation of a hinge joint does not necessarily increase contact forces. Thus, a change in joint moments at the hip may not be as critical as a change in joint forces or axial loading rates. Therefore, from a biologic and mechanical perspective, the increases in the loading rate of the ground reaction force and the axial loading rate at the ankle, knee, and hip cannot be neglected.

Current interventions for the treatment of medial compartment knee OA aim to reduce the first peak knee adduction moment to reduce the load transferred through the medial compartment of the knee. These load-modifying interventions include bracing ([38][39]), footwear modifications ([40-42]), gait training ([10]), and quadriceps muscle strengthening ([43-47]). However, it has been shown that footwear modification may also alter the loading rate of the ground reaction force during walking ([48][49]). Thus, in order to develop effective strategies for the treatment of medial compartment knee OA, interventions that solely focus on reducing the load distribution at the knee should be evaluated not only for their primary effects on knee adduction moments, but also for their secondary effects.

The most successful intervention for slowing the rate of progression of medial compartment knee OA may be an intervention that assists the natural compensation strategy used by patients with medial compartment knee OA. To date, the role of core- and hip-muscle strength in the treatment and prevention of knee OA has not received any attention. The major kinematic and kinetic gait differences between patients with medial compartment knee OA and control subjects are generally observed in the frontal plane ([7-12]). However, physical therapy ([43-47]) has concentrated on strengthening the quadriceps muscle, which, while stabilizing the joint, acts primarily in the sagittal plane. The observation that patients with more severe knee OA have smaller hip adduction moments and greater knee adduction moments during walking suggests that strengthening hip abductor muscles, especially in patients with more severe knee OA, may be an effective, yet noninvasive, treatment for medial compartment knee OA.

In summary, patients with medial compartment knee OA walk with a different gait pattern than do matched control subjects. All patients landed with the knee in a more extended position, experienced a more rapid increase in the ground reaction force, had greater knee and hip abduction moments, and had greater lateral ground reaction force, indicating a more rapid shift of the body's weight from the contralateral limb to the support limb and a lateral shift of the trunk. This change in loading pattern is a possible strategy of gait compensation used by patients with knee OA to reduce the mediolateral distance between the center of mass and the knee, thereby reducing the moment arm of the ground reaction force and supposedly reducing the knee adduction moment at a subsequent point during stance. This strategy appears to be successful only in patients with less severe knee OA. Gait changes appear to be initiated before heel strike and this not only affects the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee, but also leads to increased axial loading rates at all joints of the lower extremity. More rapidly increasing joint forces may lead to a more rapid progression of existing OA and to the initiation of OA at joints adjacent to the knee. Thus, interventions that are aimed at slowing the rate of progression of OA should be assessed for their effects on the joint mechanics not only of the knee, but also of all joints of the lower extremity.


Acknowledgements

 

 

 

 

 

 

The authors express their appreciation to Drs. Debra Hurwitz and Leena Sharma for their contribution to the collection of gait and clinical data, and to the NIH for partial funding of this project.


References

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum 1987; 30: 914-8. Links  

2

Fife RS, Klippel JH, Weyand CM, Wortmann RL. Osteoarthritis. A. Epidemiology, pathology and pathogenesis. In: Klippel JH , Weyand CM , Wortmann RL , editors. Primer on the rheumatic diseases. Atlanta: Arthritis Foundation; 1997. p. 216-7.

3

Peyron JG, Altman RD, Moskowitz RW, Howe DS, Goldberg VM, Mankin HJ. The epidemiology of osteoarthritis. In: Moskowitz RW , Howe DS , Goldberg VM , Mankin HJ , editors. Osteoarthritis: diagnosis and medical surgical management. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1993. p. 15-35.

4

Oliveria SA, Felson DT, Reed JI, Cirillo PA, Walker AM. Incidence of symptomatic hand, hip, and knee osteoarthritis among patients in a health maintenance organization. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 1134-41. Links  

5

Thomas RH, Resnick D, Alazraki NP, Daniel D, Greenfield R. Compartmental evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee: a comparative study of available diagnostic modalities. Radiology 1975; 116: 585-94. Links  

6

Schipplein OD, Andriacchi TP. Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking. J Orthop Res 1991; 9: 113-9. Links  

7

Baliunas AJ, Hurwitz DE, Ryals AB, Karrar A, Case JP, Block JA, et al. Increased knee joint loads during walking are present in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10: 573-9. Links  

8

Gok H, Ergin S, Yavuzer G. Kinetic and kinematic characteristics of gait in patients with medial knee arthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73: 647-52. Links  

9

Schnitzer TJ, Popovich JM, Andersson GB, Andriacchi TP. Effect of piroxicam on gait in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36: 1207-13. Links  

10

Mundermann A, Dyrby CO, Hurwitz DE, Sharma L, Andriacchi TP. Potential strategies to reduce medial compartment loading in patients with knee osteoarthritis of varying severity: reduced walking speed. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 1172-8. Links  

11

Sharma L, Hurwitz DE, Thonar EJ, Sum JA, Lenz ME, Dunlop DD, et al. Knee adduction moment, serum hyaluronan level, and disease severity in medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: 1233-40. Links  

12

Miyazaki T, Wada M, Kawahara H, Sato M, Baba H, Shimada S. Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61: 617-22. Links  

13

Childs JD, Sparto PJ, Fitzgerald GK, Bizzini M, Irrgang JJ. Alterations in lower extremity movement and muscle activation patterns in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004; 19: 44-9. Links  

14

Kaufman KR, Hughes C, Morrey BF, Morrey M, An KN. Gait characteristics of patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Biomech 2001; 34: 907-15. Links  

15

Radin EL, Yang KH, Riegger C, Kish VL, O'Connor JJ. Relationship between lower limb dynamics and knee joint pain. J Orthop Res 1991; 9: 398-405. Links  

16

Stauffer RN, Chao EY, Gvory AN. Biomechanical gait analysis of the diseased knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; 126: 246-55. Links  

17

Chen CP, Chen MJ, Pei YC, Lew HL, Wong PY, Tang SF. Sagittal plane loading response during gait in different age groups and in people with knee osteoarthritis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: 307-12. Links  

18

Al-Zahrani KS, Bakheit AM. A study of the gait characteristics of patients with chronic osteoarthritis of the knee. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 275-80. Links  

19

McGibbon CA, Krebs DE. Compensatory gait mechanics in patients with unilateral knee arthritis. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 2410-9. Links  

20

Messier SP. Osteoarthritis of the knee and associated factors of age and obesity: effects on gait. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 1446-52. Links  

21

Messier SP, Loeser RF, Hoover JL, Semble EL, Wise CM. Osteoarthritis of the knee: effects on gait, strength, and flexibility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 29-36. Links  

22

Brinkmann JR, Perry J. Rate and range of knee motion during ambulation in healthy and arthritic subjects. Phys Ther 1985; 65: 1055-60. Links  

23

Kirtley C, Whittle MW, Jefferson RJ. Influence of walking speed on gait parameters. J Biomed Eng 1985; 7: 282-8. Links  

24

Hurwitz DE, Ryals AR, Block JA, Sharma L, Schnitzer TJ, Andriacchi TP. Knee pain and joint loading in subjects with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Orthop Res 2000; 18: 572-9. Links  

25

Ewers BJ, Jayaraman VM, Banglmaier RF, Haut RC. Rate of blunt impact loading affects changes in retropatellar cartilage and underlying bone in the rabbit patella. J Biomech 2002; 35: 747-55. Links  

26

Kerin AJ, Coleman A, Wisnom MR, Adams MA. Propagation of surface fissures in articular cartilage in response to cyclic loading in vitro. Clin Biomech 2003; 18: 960-8. Links  

27

Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833-40. Links  

28

Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheumatism 1991; 34: 505-14. Links  

29

Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Atlas of standard radiographs of arthritis. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1963.

30

Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69: 745-9. Links  

31

Prodromos CC, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO. A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 1188-94. Links  

32

Wang JW, Kuo KN, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO. The influence of walking mechanics and time on the results of proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 905-9. Links  

33

Andriacchi TP, Johnson TD, Hurwitz DE, Natarajan RN. Musculoskeletal dynamics, locomotion, and clinical applications. In: Mow VC , Huiskes R , editors. Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 91-122.

34

Yamada H, Koshino T, Sakai N, Saito T. Hip adductor muscle strength in patients with varus deformed knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 386: 179-85. Links  

35

Bergmann G, Kniggendorf H, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Influence of shoes and heel strike on the loading of the hip joint. J Biomech 1995; 28: 817-27. Links  

36

Elliott AL, Kraus VB, Luta G, Stabler T, Renner JB, Woodard J, et al. Serum hyaluronan levels and radiographic knee and hip osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 105-11. Links  

37

Andriacchi TP, Mundermann A, Smith RL, Alexander EJ, Dyrby CO, Koo S. A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the knee. Ann Biomed Eng 2004; 32: 447-57. Links  

38

Lindenfeld TN, Hewett TE, Andriacchi TP. Joint loading with valgus bracing in patients with varus gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 344: 290-7. Links  

39

Pollo FE, Otis JC, Backus SI, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL. Reduction of medial compartment loads with valgus bracing of the osteoarthritic knee. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30: 414-21. Links  

40

Kerrigan DC, Karvosky ME, Lelas JL, Riley PO. Men's shoes and knee joint torques relevant to the development and progression of knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 529-33. Links  

41

Kerrigan DC, Lelas JL, Goggins J, Merriman GJ, Kaplan RJ, Felson DT. Effectiveness of a lateral-wedge insole on knee varus torque in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 889-93. Links  

42

Fisher DS, Mundermann A, Andriacchi TP. Gait adaptations to recent footwear history: implication for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Trans Orthop Res Soc 2004; 50: 88. Links  

43

Fisher NM, Gresham GE, Abrams M, Hicks J, Horrigan D, Pendergast DR. Quantitative effects of physical therapy on muscular and functional performance in subjects with osteoarthritis of the knees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 840-7. Links  

44

Fisher NM, Pendergast DR, Gresham GE, Calkins E. Muscle rehabilitation: its effect on muscular and functional performance of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 367-74. Links  

45

Fransen M, Crosbie J, Edmonds J. Physical therapy is effective for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 156-64. Links  

46

Huang MH, Lin YS, Yang RC, Lee CL. A comparison of various therapeutic exercises on the functional status of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2003; 32: 398-406. Links  

47

Rogind H, Bibow-Nielsen B, Jensen B, Moller HC, Frimodt-Moller H, Bliddal H. The effects of a physical training program on patients with osteoarthritis of the knees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1421-7. Links  

48

Light LH, McLellan GE, Klenerman L. Skeletal transients on heel strike in normal walking with different footwear. J Biomech 1980; 13: 477-80. Links  

49

Wakeling JM, Liphardt AM, Nigg BM. Muscle activity reduces soft-tissue resonance at heel-strike during walking. J Biomech 2003; 36: 1761-9. Links