Login:   

Register

 

 

Home

Browse

My Settings

Alerts

Help


 Quick Search

  Title, abstract, keywords


  Author




  

  Journal/book title


  Volume


  Issue


  Page


         


Gait & Posture

Volume 25, Issue 3, March 2007, Pages 440-452

 

Font Size:     


  Abstract

- selected

 

 

Article

 

 

Figures/Tables

 

 

References

 

 

  Purchase PDF (1142 K)

 


   E-mail Article   

   Add to my Quick Links   

 

 

   Cited By in Scopus (0)

 

 

Related Articles in ScienceDirect

 

Differences in lower limb transverse plane joint moment...

Journal of Biomechanics

 

Relationship between alignment and kinematic and kineti...

Clinical Biomechanics

 

The effect of gait modification on the external knee ad...

Clinical Biomechanics


 

View More Related Articles

 

 

View Record in Scopus

 doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.018      

Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

On the expression of joint moments during gait

Anthony G. Schache and Richard Baker

Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia


Received 15 May 2006;  accepted 15 May 2006.  Available online 29 September 2006. 

 

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of different reference frames on lower limb joint moments during gait with a view to identifying a recommended convention for clinical purposes. Data were collected from 10 subjects (nine able-bodied adults and one child with diplegic cerebral palsy) whilst walking at a self-selected speed. Calculations utilised a three-dimensional inverse dynamics model. For each joint, moments were expressed in four different reference frames. Three of the frames were orthogonal: laboratory frame; anatomical frame of proximal segment; anatomical frame of distal segment. The fourth reference frame was a non-orthogonal joint coordinate system (JCS). Significant differences in the joint moment profiles during gait were found with alternative references frames. This was apparent primarily for the transverse plane joint moments for able-bodied adult gait. For the pathological gait pattern presented, there were also marked differences in the frontal plane joint moments and more subtle ones in the sagittal plane. Whilst it is recognised that all possible reference frames for the expression of the net moment vector are mathematically valid, a decision needs to be made as to which one is more clinically useful. It is proposed that the non-orthogonal JCS is most logical on the basis of what, biomechanically, the joint moment actually represents.

Keywords: Gait analysis; Inverse dynamics; Lower limb; Joint coordinate system

Article Outline

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Subjects

2.2. Instrumentation

2.3. Frame definitions

2.4. Procedures

2.5. Data analysis

3. Results

3.1. Joint kinematic profiles

3.2. Joint moment profiles

3.3. Effect of different reference frame

4. Discussion

Acknowledgements

References







Gait & Posture

Volume 25, Issue 3, March 2007, Pages 440-452

 

 

Home

Browse

My Settings

Alerts

Help

 

About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy

 

Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.